Comments for Contract Law http://www.contractlawtoday.com The latest on contract world affecting you and me Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:21:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 Comment on Contract Law Consideration by raymond yagoe http://www.contractlawtoday.com/contract-law-consideration/#comment-223 raymond yagoe Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:41:36 +0000 http://www.contractlawtoday.com/contract-law-consideration/#comment-223 i will like to get infomations about contract law i will like to get infomations about contract law

]]> Comment on Contract Law Requirments by Smita http://www.contractlawtoday.com/contract-law-requirments/#comment-13 Smita Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:56:03 +0000 http://www.contractlawtoday.com/contract-law-requirments/#comment-13 the principle f promissory estoppel is a shield but nota sword the principle f promissory estoppel is a shield but nota sword

]]> Comment on Construction Contract Law by odhav http://www.contractlawtoday.com/construction-contract-law/#comment-11 odhav Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:44:57 +0000 http://www.contractlawtoday.com/construction-contract-law/#comment-11 Sir, In today's law peoeple refuge even written agreement onthe ground that the reason of agrement was something else than the facts written in agreement. In my case my lessee stated in court that lease agreement was made with the intention to show the document in some department and claime that land was identified by him and purchased by him.The land was in green zone and he was not farmer so this arrangement was done.In fact he has nothing to do with land or ha has not invested anything in the land, even though he put two witnesses who confirmed what he says is write. So whar to do of this type of people? Sir,
In today’s law peoeple refuge even written agreement onthe ground that the reason of agrement was something else than the facts written in agreement.
In my case my lessee stated in court that lease agreement was made with the intention to show the document in some department and claime that land was identified by him and purchased by him.The land was in green zone and he was not farmer so this arrangement was done.In fact he has nothing to do with land or ha has not invested anything in the land, even though he put two witnesses who confirmed what he says is write. So whar to do of this type of people?

]]>