<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Construction Contract Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contractlawtoday.com/construction-contract-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contractlawtoday.com/construction-contract-law/</link>
	<description>The latest on contract world affecting you and me</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: odhav</title>
		<link>http://www.contractlawtoday.com/construction-contract-law/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>odhav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contractlawtoday.com/construction-contract-law/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Sir,
In today's law peoeple refuge even written agreement onthe ground that the reason of agrement was something else than the facts written in agreement.
In my case my lessee stated in court that lease agreement was made with the intention to show the document in some department and claime that land was identified by him and purchased by him.The land was in green zone and he was not farmer so this arrangement was done.In fact he has nothing to do with land or ha has not invested anything in the land, even though he put two witnesses who confirmed what he says is write. So whar to do of this type of people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir,<br />
In today&#8217;s law peoeple refuge even written agreement onthe ground that the reason of agrement was something else than the facts written in agreement.<br />
In my case my lessee stated in court that lease agreement was made with the intention to show the document in some department and claime that land was identified by him and purchased by him.The land was in green zone and he was not farmer so this arrangement was done.In fact he has nothing to do with land or ha has not invested anything in the land, even though he put two witnesses who confirmed what he says is write. So whar to do of this type of people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

